Social Justice
“The most powerful of authoritarians built their success on an association with social justice.” Referencing two authoritarians from different regions, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
Introduction
Historical context (establish perspective)
In the cold war, the authoritarians often needs to consolidate its power to ensure their successful control over the government and the country. Many social problem they have face for their new born country and it has benefits and drawbacks for them.
Thesis
Topic-Nasser
Historical context | Land reform |
Who | the poor, the rich and Nasser |
What | Nasser redistributed the rich’s land to poor peasants in Egypt. |
When | 1952 |
Where | Egypt |
Why |
this was a response to the current situation of poverty in Egypt |
Analysis |
This policy have gain Nasser support from the peasantry, the majority in the population, for his resolution to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor, which certainly help consolidate his new born regime, hence helped his success. However, this solution to this social issue have made him unpopular among the rich and the western countries that doing business with them. This have made many western countries stopped trading with Egypt and made Egypt’s economy suffer huge loses. And this made Nasser’s dream to unite the Arab world more unlikely to happen given the worsened economy of Egypt. |
Topic-Castro
Historical context | The public school system |
Who | Castro and the people of education |
What | public school system covering from primary school to college have been set up for the Cuban people |
When | 1959 to now |
Where | Cuba |
Why (cause/effect) | This was an effort to solve to low literacy rate in Cuba, and also an effort to solve the economy problems Cuba face by providing more qualified labor. |
Analysis (significance to your argument) |
Conclusion
Continuity
We can see that these two authoritarian have very similar socialist approach towards social problems that are associated with the poor. They tried to give benefits to the poor in order to gain their support for the government or to make them to live better, but their ignorance towards the economic aspects of their country have let their country to suffer tremendous losses on the economy. This have surely tell us that socialist policies often have drawbacks on the economy because of their affinity to the poor and hostility towards the rich who is the real engine for economic development.